<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>wifitalk.ca &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wifitalk.ca/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wifitalk.ca</link>
	<description>News and Information about mobile voip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New iPhone Could Come to Mobilicity, Wind</title>
		<link>http://www.wifitalk.ca/canada/new-iphone-could-come-to-mobilicity-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wifitalk.ca/canada/new-iphone-could-come-to-mobilicity-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 21:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobilicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wifitalk.ca/?p=1209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumours abound that the new iPhone 5 (or 4S, depending on who you listen to) will have a unified baseband which will work on Sprint and T-Mobile&#8217;s networks in the US. I try to stay away from regurgitating rumours, but this has interesting implications for Canada. Sprint runs a WiMax 4G network which has very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumours abound that the new iPhone 5 (or 4S, depending on who you listen to) will have a <a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2011/05/the-latest-rumors-about-apples.ars">unified baseband which will work on Sprint and T-Mobile&#8217;s networks</a> in the US.</p>
<p>I try to stay away from regurgitating rumours, but this has interesting implications for Canada. Sprint runs a WiMax 4G network which has very little implication for Canadian carriers, but the fact that the new iPhone may be able to run on T-Mobile&#8217;s &#8220;4G&#8221; (I say that because it is in fact HSPA+ and not true 4G/LTE) network could mean big things for Canadians.</p>
<p>T-Mobile runs on the same AWS band that new entrants Wind Mobile and Mobilicity run on &#8211; whatever phones work with T-Mobile&#8217;s high-speed network should also work with Wind and Mobilicity. The new entrants haven&#8217;t had much trouble growing their subscriber base, but there are still potential customers waiting in the wings because they want the iPhone.</p>
<p>One only needs to look south of the border to see how big a boost an AWS iPhone will be for Wind and Mobilicity. When the CDMA iPhone 4 finally came to Verizon, it was the most successful phone launch in Verizon history.</p>
<img src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1209&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wifitalk.ca/canada/new-iphone-could-come-to-mobilicity-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official Google Voice App Approved for App Store</title>
		<link>http://www.wifitalk.ca/google-voice/official-google-voice-app-approved-for-app-store/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wifitalk.ca/google-voice/official-google-voice-app-approved-for-app-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ios4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wifitalk.ca/?p=1124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechCrunch is announcing that the official Google branded Google Voice app has been approved on the Apple App Store and we should see it in the next few weeks, pending some updates to enable some iOS4 features. They claim that there is no official word yet, just rumours that the app has been approved by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/27/google-voice-iphone-3/">TechCrunch</a> is announcing that the official Google branded Google Voice app has been approved on the Apple App Store and we should see it in the next few weeks, pending some updates to enable some iOS4 features.</p>
<p>They claim that there is no official word yet, just rumours that the app has been approved by Apple. This makes sense however, as <a href="http://www.wifitalk.ca/google-voice/gv-mobile-approved/">several other</a> Google Voice <a href="http://www.wifitalk.ca/google-voice/gv-connect-hits-the-app-store/">apps</a> have been approved recently, with Apple&#8217;s <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/apple-to-publish-guidelines-for-app-approval/article1700935/">revamping of the rules</a> on the App Store.</p>
<p>I wonder how the producers of the other Google Voice apps will fare, as the official Google version is likely to be free&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1124&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wifitalk.ca/google-voice/official-google-voice-app-approved-for-app-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype Disappears From the App Store &#8211; UPDATED</title>
		<link>http://www.wifitalk.ca/skype/skype-disappears-from-the-app-store/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wifitalk.ca/skype/skype-disappears-from-the-app-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wifitalk.ca/?p=1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE FROM SKYPE: &#8220;Today, Skype just submitted a new version of its iOS4 build to Apple. In the process we encountered some difficulties. Skype will work quickly to get its current Skype for iPhone app back up as soon as possible.” Looks like it was just an updating issue. TechCrunch says that Skype has disappeared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE FROM SKYPE</strong>: <em>&#8220;Today, Skype just submitted a new version of its iOS4 build to Apple. In the process we encountered some difficulties. Skype will work quickly to get its current Skype for iPhone app back up as soon as possible.”</em></p>
<p>Looks like it was just an updating issue.</p>
<p>TechCrunch says that <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/16/skype-iphone/">Skype has disappeared from the App Store</a>.</p>
<p>No word yet on if this is a glitch, or if Apple has just removed it.</p>
<p>I can confirm that the Skype App doesn&#8217;t appear in the Canadian version of the store either. This leads me to believe that this isn&#8217;t just a glitch. <em>UPDATE</em>: <a href="http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=506791">Gone from the Japan and Australia stores too.</a></p>
<p>The Skype website still has an <a href="http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/get-skype/on-your-mobile/download/iphone-for-skype/">iPhone app page</a>, but clicking on the link just gives you something like this:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Skype Not Available" src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/images/skype-not-available.png" alt="Skype Not Available" width="513" height="218" /></p>
<p>Some posts on the Skype forums suggest that <a title="Skype Forum" href="http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=654803">iOS 4.0.1 doesn&#8217;t work with Skype</a>.</p>
<p>Why might this be? I can think of a couple of reasons (all purely conjecture at this point).</p>
<ol>
<li>It&#8217;s a glitch, and it&#8217;ll be back up later. (with one app store maybe, but with both Canada AND the US?)</li>
<li><strong>Skype is updating the app, and this is a temporary effect from removing the old version before the new one comes up.</strong></li>
<li>Maybe AT&amp;T is upset over the loss of long-distance minutes Skype users save on and have gotten Apple to pull the app because it &#8220;replicates functionality&#8221; of the iPhone.</li>
<li>Maybe Apple is upset over Skype getting cozier with Verizon and BlackBerry in their partnerships</li>
<li>Maybe Apple is upset that Skype hasn&#8217;t updated their app to include iOS4 features yet and are pushing them to release a new version</li>
<li>Aliens (it could be anything).</li>
</ol>
<p>UPDATE 2: Seems some users are getting a pop-up message when logging into skype on their iPhones:</p>
<blockquote><p>Free Skype trial</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got until at least August 2010<br />
to make and receive free Skype-to-<br />
Skype calls over your mobile<br />
network.</p>
<p>After that, you&#8217;ll need a mobile<br />
subscription.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is the Skype app about to become pay-per-use?</p>
<p>Thoughts? Comments?</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Skype Missing On App Store" src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/images/skype-iphone-page.png" alt="Skype Site Still Lists iPhone App" width="505" height="295" /></p>
<img src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1016&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wifitalk.ca/skype/skype-disappears-from-the-app-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>24 Wireless Carriers Join Forces To Provide App Store Compatibility</title>
		<link>http://www.wifitalk.ca/uncategorized/24-wireless-carriers-join-forces-to-provide-app-store-compatibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wifitalk.ca/uncategorized/24-wireless-carriers-join-forces-to-provide-app-store-compatibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ovi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wifitalk.ca/?p=819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CBC is carrying a story about a consortium of 24 international wireless carriers including giants AT&#38;T, Verizon, Vodafone, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, and Telefonica who have joined forces with hardware manufacturers Samsung, LG, and Sony Ericsson to provide an app store which will be ubiquitous across all carriers and platforms. Wind Mobile is Canada&#8217;s only participant. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2010/02/15/wireless-carriers-app-store.html?ref=rss">The CBC</a> is carrying a story about a consortium of 24 international wireless carriers including giants AT&amp;T, Verizon, Vodafone, China Mobile, Deutsche Telekom, and Telefonica who have joined forces with hardware manufacturers Samsung, LG, and Sony Ericsson to provide an app store which will be ubiquitous across all carriers and platforms. Wind Mobile is Canada&#8217;s only participant.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="Many App Stores" src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/images/many-markets.jpg" alt="App stores about to become one? Not likely." width="263" height="192" />The goal of this alliance is &#8220;to create a wholesale applications ecosystem that — from day one — will establish a simple route to market for developers to deliver the latest innovative applications and services to the widest possible base of customers around the world. In the immediate future the alliance will seek to unite members’ developer communities and create a single, harmonized point of entry to make it easy for developers to join.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2010/02/15/wireless-carriers-app-store.html?ref=rss#ixzz0fdEEx1P7">http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2010/02/15/wireless-carriers-app-store.html?ref=rss#ixzz0fdEEx1P7</a></p>
<p>The current system of app stores (iPhone App Store, Google Marketplace, BlackBerry App World, Nokia Ovi World) seems to work well for consumers if you are only ever going to stick to one platform. However, what happens when you want to switch phones? Maybe you have an iPhone today, but tomorrow you want to go with an Android-based phone? Or what if your job gives you a BlackBerry? All of your purchased apps are now stuck on the old platform and there&#8217;s no way to bring them over, even if the same app is available on your new phone.</p>
<p>The current system is no friend to developers either. If a developer wants to reach the different platforms, they have to code up as many different versions of their app as there are platforms, often in different languages altogether. Different APIs, different rules, different features, and different platforms all need to be accounted for and supported.</p>
<p>Just about the only group that benefits from segregated markets are the established app stores. Forcing users to double-buy means that they get that extra cut  on the extra sale, however this is a double-edged sword. For an established app store like the iPhone&#8217;s, it provides user retention &#8211; someone who has spent $100 on apps isn&#8217;t likely to switch to another platform and lose access to their apps. For up-and-coming app stores it&#8217;s a rather sizeable barrier to entry. Why should a user with $100 invested in the app store switch to the new guy?</p>
<p>The app developers do get some benefit as well, receiving double revenues on double sales, however these aren&#8217;t expected to be very high, and if they are putting in quadruple the amount of work to develop and support multiple versions of their app, it&#8217;s of little benefit.</p>
<img src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=819&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wifitalk.ca/uncategorized/24-wireless-carriers-join-forces-to-provide-app-store-compatibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad In Canada &#8211; Reaction</title>
		<link>http://www.wifitalk.ca/canada/ipad-in-canada-reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wifitalk.ca/canada/ipad-in-canada-reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g aws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wifitalk.ca/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Apple officially announced it&#8217;s new device &#8211; the iPad. The hands-on reviews have yet to come in, but will undoubtedly be on any number of sites soon. What does the iPad mean to Canadian consumers, what is it good for, and what are the communication implications? This article will be divided into two parts: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--pagetitle:The iPad: Introduction-->Today, Apple officially announced it&#8217;s new device &#8211; <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad">the iPad</a>. The hands-on reviews have yet to come in, but will undoubtedly be on any number of <a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/01/apple-announces-ipad-attempts-to-change-the-world.ars">sites</a> soon.</p>
<p>What does the iPad mean to Canadian consumers, what is it good for, and what are the communication implications? This article will be divided into two parts: First, a commentary on the iPad itself &#8211; my own personal reaction. Second, I will analyze its position in the Canadian wireless industry. (Updated: Wireless commentary <a href="http://www.wifitalk.ca/canada/ipad-in-canada-communications/">here</a>)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/images/ipad-apple.jpg" alt="iPad" /></p>
<p><span id="more-731"></span></p>
<h2>The iPad:</h2>
<p>The specs on the iPad are available one Apple&#8217;s <a title="iPad specifications at apple.com" href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/" target="_blank">iPad site</a>. This was a much-anticipated launch and many rumours about features and specifications were flying all over the net for the past several months. Steve Jobs posted a tweet to the effect that the iPad is going to be the device people remember Apple for, not the iPhone or the iMac. Will it live up to the hype?</p>
<h3></h3>
<p><!--pagetitle:The iPad: The Good--></p>
<h2>The iPad: The Good</h2>
<h4>Formfactor</h4>
<p>The weight (1.5 lbs) and size (9.7&#8243; screen) are nice. I have not gotten my hands on one, so I can&#8217;t say much about typing on it. The LED backlit IPS screen is apparently quite gorgeous as well. In order to be ultraportable it should have something on a netbook in terms of size, which it does. Having the screen size it does means you don&#8217;t have to hold it up to your face in order to read it.</p>
<h4>The Battery</h4>
<p>Anyone who has the pleasure of using one of the new MacBook Pros knows just how good the batteries in them are. It seems Apple has carried this battery technology over to the iPad. 10 hours of video/internet/actual use is quite amazing. 1 month of standby time is obviously overkill but comes with the territory of having a fantastic battery.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 330px"><img title="The iPad Playing a Movie" src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/images/ipad-startrek.jpg" alt="ipad screen" width="320" height="316" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Pretty</p></div>
<h4>The Processor</h4>
<p>The in-house designed processor is probably the best part of this device from where I sit. It shows Apple&#8217;s commitment to tailor their hardware specifically to the function of the device, rather than seeing what parts are out there and building what they can from them. The Apple silicon, system-on-a-chip technology is what will give them the advantage over other entrants into this market.</p>
<h4>3G &#8211; Unlocked</h4>
<p>I also like the fact that the 3G version is unlocked. I can understand why Apple initially had to have exclusivity agreements with the iPhone, but now that they have some critical mass behind their devices, and consumer investment in the app store, they can employ a strategy of wider adoption and capitalize on the app store revenues.</p>
<p>The inclusion of data-only 3G as an option was practically a given as the device doesn&#8217;t lend itself well to being a phone. It&#8217;s nice to see no-contract service agreements that you can sign up for from the iPad itself. I can only hope that this kind of thing comes to the iPod touch but won&#8217;t hold my breath. An important question that needs to be answered is: <strong>Is there some way to piggy back the iPad 3G account onto an existing 3G account?</strong> That is, do I have to pay $30/mo for iPhone 3G and an additional $30/mo for iPad 3G, or can I combine the two devices under my single account?</p>
<h4>iBook</h4>
<p>The iBooks reader looks really slick, and the dropdown menus for the apps are great UI changes. Hopefully these will percolate through to the iPhone. I could easily see myself reading books on something like this.</p>
<h3></h3>
<p><!--pagetitle:The iPad: The Not So Good--></p>
<h2>The iPad: The Not So Good</h2>
<p>It&#8217;s basically just a big iPod touch. That can do 3G. So it&#8217;s like an iPhone. But it can&#8217;t make calls.</p>
<h4>Screen: Should be HD</h4>
<p>The 1024&#215;768 screen should have been 1280&#215;960 or 1280&#215;800 in my opinion. This would allow for 720p content to be played and would have paralleled the screen resolution on the MacBooks. Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but 1024&#215;768 seems like such a 1999 resolution. The iPad is apparently capable of playing 720p video (according to the iPad site), so why not display it all?</p>
<p>I realize that 99% of all websites are designed to run on a screen width of 1024 pixels, so this resolution makes for an ideal web browsing experience, but I doubt that the performance cost of going to a slightly larger screen would have been that significant.</p>
<h4>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 539px"><img class="  " title="iPad - iWork" src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/images/ipad-iwork.jpg" alt="iPad running iWork" width="529" height="229" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Pages? Really?</p></div>
<p>iWork? Really?</h4>
<p>iWork for the iPad looks neat however I wouldn&#8217;t ever use it. I doubt that typing on it would ever feel natural enough to justify getting Pages, and if I need to use Pages, I&#8217;m working on a laptop. I&#8217;d have to play with Numbers in order to really understand how I would use it on the iPad. It seems like a key pad and mouse is the best way to go for that application and the transition to a touch device seems awkward. Keynote on the other hand, I can see. I wouldn&#8217;t ever want to use the iPad as my main Keynote authoring platform, but adjustments to presentations would work well. I guess it&#8217;s not <em>bad</em> to include iWork apps, but my MacBook Pro can do all of these things and do them better, so I am not compelled to switch.</p>
<h4>Flash</h4>
<p>Really? No flash support? Really?</p>
<h4>Mobility</h4>
<p>I already have an iPod touch and don&#8217;t quite feel compelled to get an iPad. The 3G is nice, but for most of the places I go, I have wifi, and the only thing I find I&#8217;d like to have 3G connectivity for is for making a phone call. Since the iPad doesn&#8217;t do phone calls natively, it seems like the 3G add on is lost on me.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m truly trying to &#8220;be mobile&#8221; I find that the iPod touch/iPhone platform is fantastic for browsing. Is it just me or are the mobile versions of websites better than the full versions anyways?</p>
<h3></h3>
<p><!--pagetitle:The iPad: The Missing--></p>
<h2>The iPad: The Missing</h2>
<h4>No Tablet</h4>
<p>We all thought this was going to be a tablet. So where&#8217;s the pen? Where&#8217;s the handwriting/notetaking software? This device could have been HUGE with students as a true tablet combined with a textbook subscription service.</p>
<h4>
<p><div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 309px"><img title="iPad Youtube" src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/images/ipad-youtube.jpg" alt="iPad Youtube" width="299" height="295" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Imagine: iChat on top, doc editing below</p></div></h4>
<h4>No iSight</h4>
<p>A front-facing iSight camera would have launched the mobile video conferencing trend that seems to be coming. People have wanted this feature on the iPhone, so why not try it out on the iPad? Imagine this: You&#8217;re sitting in a chair with your iPad, and the top 1/3 of the screen has 2 video feeds showing on it &#8211; a client and a co-worker. The lower 2/3 of the screen is a document you are all working on. You pull out your pen and make changes, circling, highlighting, editing, scrolling by touch, and your client and co-worker see the updates. Okay that&#8217;s a lot to ask, but I&#8217;d still like to talk to my mom on it.</p>
<h4>No Multitasking</h4>
<p>Better hardware and more battery life and it still can&#8217;t run more than one thing?</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 13px;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><!--pagetitle:The iPad: Where Does It Fit--></p>
<h2>The iPad: Where Does It Fit?</h2>
<p>If you want to do work, you have a laptop and the iPad isn&#8217;t for you. If you want to listen to music and browse the web casually, then you probably have a smartphone or iPod touch and the iPad doesn&#8217;t really offer any improvements to your experience.</p>
<p>For people who have both a laptop and a smartphone-type device, the iPad is a very tough sell. It doesn&#8217;t seem to do anything better than either a laptop or an iPhone except for being an eReader.</p>
<p>But what if you don&#8217;t have a laptop (or need a new one), and don&#8217;t have a smart device (or need a new one)? Could you get an iPad and replace some old devices? Maybe. I couldn&#8217;t really see typing on it very much, even with the keyboard dock, but it could be useful for a person who travels a lot and for some reason can&#8217;t carry something as big as a laptop around during the day.</p>
<p>The suitability of the iPad as a mobile communication device will be the subject of a follow-up article.</p>
<img src="http://www.wifitalk.ca/blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=731&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wifitalk.ca/canada/ipad-in-canada-reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

